Saturday, July 11, 2020

Major U.S. Naval Presence in Pacific Ruined China Narrative of Crippled U.S. Fleet

Per my earlier piece highlighting the current dramatic U.S. deployment of three supercarriers to the Pacific, following a recent surge of U.S. submarines in the region, China appears extremely unhappy by the massive U.S. show of force. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) had been taking advantage of the temporarily sidelined U.S. carriers due to COVID-19 to project an image of a weakened U.S. and make its own show of force and bullying in the South China Sea and around Taiwan (RELATED: Captain of COVID-19-Stricken U.S. Aircraft Carrier – Hero or Danger?).

Previously I called all these moves the “aircraft carrier information wars.” With the latest U.S. naval deployments, the U.S. has clearly changed the narrative (RELATED: U.S. Navy Challenging China Throughout South China Sea).

The USS Ronald Reagan and the USS Theodore Roosevelt are both patrolling in the western Pacific, while the USS Nimitz is in the eastern Pacific. This represents the biggest deployment of U.S. aircraft carriers in the Pacific since 2017.

This three-carrier deployment comes after the U.S. Pacific Fleet said last month that all its forward-deployed submarines were at sea conducting operations in the western Pacific. CNN noted that experts said this likely involved more than eight stealthy fast-attack vessels.

Carl Schuster, a former director of operations at the U.S. Pacific Command’s Joint Intelligence Center, said in the CNN report that this attack submarine surge wasn’t a coincidence.

“The (Chinese navy) doesn’t know where those submarines are and that complicates any response calculations and planning,” he said especially when Beijing now also has to account for three aircraft carriers and their accompanying destroyers and cruisers.

As expected, China responded quickly trying to portray the U.S. actions as provocative. As reported by CNN, quoting a report in the CCP mouthpiece, Global Times:

“By massing these aircraft carriers, the US is attempting to demonstrate to the whole region and even the world that it remains the most powerful naval force, as they could enter the South China Sea and threaten Chinese troops on the Xisha and Nansha islands (Paracel and Spratly islands) as well as vessels passing through nearby waters, so the US could carry out its hegemonic politics.”

China’s Global Times report also included some chest thumping of its own, noting that “China possesses aircraft carrier killer weapons like the DF-21D and DF-26 anti-ship ballistic missiles,” adding that Beijing could hold drills in response to show off its anti-carrier firepower.

The reality though is that this current show of U.S. naval might in China’s backyard for now effectively countered China in the information wars.

Collin Koh, at the Institute of Defense and Strategic Studies in Singapore, said in CNN that China reacted strongly because the presence of the carriers conflicted with Beijing’s portrayal of the US Navy as a force crippled by the coronavirus pandemic.

“It goes against the narrative that China wanted to put forth that the U.S. was under stress in the Pacific,” Koh said.

Thankfully, this administration, and the U.S. Defense and Navy leadership, understand that optics, and narrative warfare/ influence operations are critical elements in the Gray Zone Conflict we are engaged in with China. Expect more forceful U.S. actions in the Pacific to help tame China’s belligerent expansionism.

READ NEXT: Disguised Chinese ‘Naval Forces’ on the Move >>

Support the Landmark Lawsuit Against Antifa

Paul Crespo
Paul Crespo
Paul Crespo is a defense and national security expert. He served as a Marine Corps officer and as a military attaché with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) at US embassies worldwide. He holds degrees from Georgetown, London, and Cambridge Universities. Paul is also CEO of SPECTRE Global Risk, a security advisory firm, and a Contributor to American Defense News.


People, Places & Things

- Advertisment -

Must Read

Russia’s Reckless ‘GRU’ Military Intelligence Could Start War With U.S.

Whether Russian military intelligence actually paid bounties to Taliban fighters to kill US troops in Afghanistan - and some senior US military leaders still...