Photo by Gage Skidmore

The Michelle Obama library in California is now set to receive $250,000 dollars in taxpayer dollars as part of the new ‘Community Funding Project’ earmark requests connected to the upcoming federal budget which is currently making its way through Congress, according to Fox News.

The earmark was sponsored by Rep. Nanette Diaz Barragán (D-Calif.) as a way to expand the library built in honor of the female Obama.

While it is customary for Presidents to have libraries built after their presidency is far less common for first ladies to receive the same treatment. And even rarer for them to receive tax-payer funds to fund their vanity projects.

The funds for the Obama library were just a part of a larger push for new pork-barrel spending which is now shaping up to cost tax-payers well north of 6 billion dollars in the next budget.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
64 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
LaserRay
LaserRay
1 month ago

Not even worth the time and trouble for me to list the litany of issues with all of this! Typical politicians – spend our hard earned money on their pet projects and we don’t get a say in the matter! Vote out this group of rats, and another group will scurry in right behind them!

Barbara Powell
Barbara Powell
1 month ago

Don’t send me any photo of that witch!!!!!!!

Lupe Alonzo Gonzalez
Lupe Alonzo Gonzalez
1 month ago
Reply to  Barbara Powell

Whor lock.

sandyj
sandyj
1 month ago
Reply to  Barbara Powell

This library is totally unnecessary. She did nothing for this country, and her spouse divided the US so badly that it may never be unified again.

Carolyn
Carolyn
1 month ago
Reply to  sandyj

agree

Use 2 b a dumbocrat
Use 2 b a dumbocrat
1 month ago
Reply to  Barbara Powell

U mean Michael? If so he’d be a worlock.

Sandra Parks Breeding
Sandra Parks Breeding
1 month ago

Pathetic. Why are the taxpayers paying for a library for MIchelle Obama. She has the money to build one on her own…based on the homes that she has. If she is the “do gooder” that she says she is, she should be insisting on contributing that money to children for education and food!!!!

Sue
Sue
1 month ago

I agree, they made more money for screwing fthe USA over, pay your own way witch!

Cindy Galt
Cindy Galt
1 month ago

And food for the tasty and mouth-watering lunches she tried to force on school children while she was FL.

Gretta
Gretta
1 month ago
Reply to  Cindy Galt

I was just thinking the same thing. If she picked out the food it would be the same slop that she forced our kids to eat in OUR schools. She could care less for our kids, she is only there to indoctrinate our kids to hate our country, just like she does.