U.S. Army via Wikimedia Commons

ANALYSIS – In what many call a politicized and ideological witch hunt masquerading as a counter ‘extremism’ effort, the Pentagon’s Countering Extremist Activity Working Group has delayed the release of its long-awaited report.

Despite the contrived partisan urgency to make this an issue to hammer conservatives and supporters of former President Trump, it’s still unclear when Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin will be briefed on the report, and the Pentagon has yet to set a date for when it will be made public.

The question is why?

As Politico’s NatSec Daily reports:

Austin first announced the establishment of the Countering Extremist Activity Working Group in an April memo, ordering that its report should be “provided … no later than 90 days from its first meeting on or about April 14, 2021.” More than four months after Austin’s deadline, however, the secretary still has not seen the final product.

Kirby defended the delay to NatSec Daily, saying in a statement: “We appreciate the work stakeholders across the enterprise have put in this important effort. That work is undergoing some additional reviews and coordination. This is an important enough issue to the Secretary and the Department that we want to get it right, and to move forward in the most deliberate way possible.”

The wait for the working group’s report conflicts with the sense of urgency the Biden administration has sought to instill about the dangers of domestic violent extremists since Jan. 6 — when a number of active-duty service members and veterans allegedly participated in the storming of the Capitol.

This exaggerated “domestic extremism” threat has become the Left’s and Democrats number one boogeyman in 2021. Trying to show that it is a major danger in the US military has been key to their narrative.

The Pentagon’s inability to define the threat, much less quantify it has many experts arguing that the danger is fairly small, and the numbers show it. Delaying the release of this report even longer, adds fuel to this speculation. It has also angered proponents of the narrative, as NatSec Daily notes:

The report’s hold-up has also frustrated Rep. ANTHONY BROWN (D-Md.), a retired U.S. Army Reserve colonel who has called for tougher measures by Congress to curb military extremism. “If you really care about the men and women who serve, you don’t delay on extremism in the ranks.”

Following the unarmed riot at the Capitol, which partisans and ideologues insist on misnaming an “insurrection,” the Defense Department has moved to root out so-called “extremists” in the U.S. military, with Austin directing commanding officers and supervisors in February to conduct a one-day “stand-down” to discuss the issue with their personnel.

Additionally the department sponsored a RAND Corporation study published in September that put forward a framework for helping commanders reduce the risk of military extremism. But the dangers of this effort being politicized, and partisan, are clear.

Many argue this effort must not become a mechanism to purge conservatives, Christians or Trump supporters from the military.

NatSec Daily reported that:

TODD HELMUS, another coauthor of the October RAND study, said the report should recommend implementing “a very strong education and awareness campaign” for incoming troops and seek to “manage perceptions” of the antiextremism efforts, “so this does not become a political lightning rod.”

Helmus also told NatSec Daily that the Pentagon should institute some type of “off-ramping intervention,” though he was pessimistic the working group would back such a proposal. “There needs to be some way of helping people who they do identify as being extremist, and help them get out,” he said.

All three RAND experts downplayed the significance of the working group’s report being delayed, but Brown, the Maryland congressman, said he was “absolutely” concerned by the Pentagon’s slow pace, and he argued the Defense Department was incapable of addressing this national security threat without congressional action.

Brown, a member of the Armed Services and Veterans’ Affairs Committees, sponsored an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act that would establish an “Office of Countering Extremism” at the Pentagon.

That, however, is a whole different fight. NatSec Daily reports that: “The White House opposed the congressman’s measure “because it would impose onerous and overly specific training and data collection requirements and would foreclose other options to address extremism.”

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of AmericanActionNews.com




Comments

  1. Most likely reason this “report “ hasn’t been released is that “extremism” in the military simply isn’t a problem!

    1. Pgb
      I can see you have never served, or if you did you paid no attention. I served 26 years in that military and it was quite evident when i first went in that racism ran rampant in all the ranks and then it was Women when put in jobs normally done by men that the hating of women in the military technical field mushroomed. In Nam one of the bravest best soldiers i had in my company was a Gay Captain and everyone knew it but he laid his life on the line many times to save others and the entire outfit except for 3 loved him and respected him. Now it is all against what used to be called cross dressers, and I have known a lot of Military career persons who were in fact what is now called Trans, and another fact less than 10% of trans ever request a sex change operation.

      1. We know…we all know it…..
        that is what will tear at its fabric
        those numbers are few …always the few that are the thorns
        Until the thing, the real war comes then will the real truth step forward
        look at those who survived Hitler’s camps, especially in Austria….then happening now as we, the survivors see the cycle being repeated ALL OVER AGAIN
        by the spirit of hitlerism
        thank you for saving us the first time, will there be a second time?

    2. The report has been delayed because it will clearly expose the Biden administration’s purge of the patriots currently serving in the military. The true “extremism” comes from the Obama generals who are now in command.

  2. It’s not released because there is no significant political/racial extremist activity in the US military. It’s a concocked meme so that this subversive administration can purge patriots from the military.

  3. Our fascist government led by democrats is going after the wrong people. The problems are all in their own party.

  4. I suspect it might be in the process of being re-written to shape the narrative that some want to publish. It will not be much more than previous massage of intel reports to fit political presentation to those wha are expecting to see what they need.

  5. Evidence of extremism is abundant and obvious in the riots that caused death and destruction across America. The groups involved are not conservative nor moderates but well known “social justice” advocates and congressional representatives who have a history of inciting violence in their rhetoric and it’s not the 45th President of the United States. Read the actual statements made by all then decide who are the actual extremist.

    1. All those names and address of each should be written down and published for all to see and remember when it becomes necessary for the rebirth of OUR NATION.

  6. Lloyd Austin is a pencil pushing butt kisser and his search for domestic terrorists is total b.s. as the US military is probably the most diverse and pro-American organization in the entire Central government.

  7. Would that also include killing/murdering seven children in Afghanistan? And NOT being held accountable? NO and NO. I’d call that the extreme of extremism.

  8. Why hasn’t the report been released???
    Reasonable answer!!
    Nothing to report, Nothing or very minimal extremism found in themilotary.
    Doesn’t fit in with the lying Pentagonor or Biden’s BS story

  9. The fact is when one enters the Military they are required to leave their politics at the door. Finally the military is doing something to get rid of the racist, the anti gay and anti women in the Military, whemn all the people thatt hose were against were as good in the military as the haters, who would not even give the ones they disliked a chance to be a good Military person, but a lot pushed on and succeeded. They now have tests that all military will be forced to take where there are no right or wrong answers but it shows the mental aptitude of the taker and where their attitudes and thinking is aimed.

  10. FJB can shove his extremism up his butt, along with FJB’s administration…he is demoralizing our armed forces…LET’S GO BRANDON

  11. They have chased everything good out the system not realizing that their underbelly is not protect
    little their Trojan there

  12. I WOULD DELAY IT AS WELL TILL ALL THE ” MILK SOP PANSIES ” ARE REMOVED AND GOOD HARD PATRIOTIC MEN ARE INSTALLED! TIME FOR THE LIKES OF GEN MILLEY AND AUSTIN TO BE REMOVED AS WELL! THEY ARE THE STAGNATION OF OUR FIGHTING FORCE THAT IS NEEDED FOR OUR SAFETY HERE!

  13. Thank goodness that our military has sworn to defend the Constitution of the United States, like their predecessors! They believe in our country and are smart enough to recognize the current administration’s actions that are destroying our country. Any efforts made by SECDEF on down, can only be seen as a political move that flies in the face of the document they have sworn to defend. ….and the administration know that!

  14. Look what happened to the poor Marine LTC. I’ll bet THEY will purge the Armed Forces of patriots who are loyal to the Constitution and to the Nation far above and beyond their loyalty to Chairman / Fearless Leader Chao Bai Deng.

  15. FIRE THIS IGNORANT MARXIST AUSTIN IMMEDIATELY! HE IS DEMORALIZING THE FORCES INTO A POOR FIGHTING GAGERNAUGHT TO KEEP THIS COUNTRY SAFE!

  16. The change that needs to made to the military and government, employees of “WE THE PEOPLE”. is a stringent order that all are required to, READ AND UNDERSTAND AS WRITTEN AND INTERPRETED BY THE FOUNDERS, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *