Gage Skidmore via Flickr

On Thursday the House voted to repeal the 2002 authorization that led to the war with Iraq. The House voted 268-161 to repeal the authorization saying the 20-year law is no longer necessary. When Republicans were in control of the House it also voted to appeal the authorization act but ultimately it went nowhere, this vote signals the repeal is going momentum to make to the President Biden’s desk.

The Hill reports:

The war authorization was initially passed by Congress to allow the U.S military to go after former President Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq, though it has occasionally been used to bolster the legal rationale for other military engagements in recent years.

“Repeal can prevent our country from entering another protected protracted engagement under this outdated authority,” Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), the sponsor of the repeal bill, said Thursday. “We can’t afford to leave this in place indefinitely. For two decades, it has been in place. This is our opportunity to restore our constitutional role.”

The Biden administration has also come out in support of repealing the 2002 AUMF, with the White House saying in a statement this week it backs Lee’s bill because “the United States has no ongoing military activities that rely solely on the 2002 AUMF as a domestic legal basis, and repeal of the 2002 AUMF would likely have minimal impact on current military operations.”

Still, Republicans argued that taking the 2002 AUMF off the books would hamstring U.S. counterterrorism missions, saying it should not be repealed until a replacement for the 2001 AUMF is agreed to.

The Trump administration also cited the 2002 authorization in part for its legal justification in the drone strike that killed Iranian terrorist Qassem Soleimani.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
MAS
MAS
1 month ago

It would be even better if congress would REPEAL everything that is either unconstitutional or extra-constitutional. That would keep them busy for years!

Leftshot
Leftshot
1 month ago
Reply to  MAS

It would except most don’t know or care to know how the Constitution constrains them. Heck, they don’t even know our basic form of governance. You hear them all the time saying the U.S. is a democracy. The Framers EXPLICITLY rejected and opposed that form of governance, in favor of a limited constitutional republic. In fact, the biggest of the big debate was on whether the limited powers proposed in the Constitution went too far.

David Baker
David Baker
1 month ago
Reply to  Leftshot

Exactly. Americans should have seen through the ruse of political parties. Dividing Americans in that manner has created a government of monstrous proportions, with no end in sight of the agendas they can implement to continue expanding their authority, and erode our freedoms.

BrewDubbs
BrewDubbs
1 month ago
Reply to  MAS

HA!! They would have to show up to work! And as Leftshot said, most don’t know or care what is and what is not constitutional… American people think, well, if it passed congress or the president signed it, it must be good… That is BS and the recent admin and POTUS#44 prove that a lot of unconstitutional things get passed into law and burden the citizens.

David Baker
David Baker
1 month ago
Reply to  BrewDubbs

Don’t forget the media. They’re ‘in’ on these shenanigans. Read about TASS, and how that organization functioned.

Captain America
Captain America
1 month ago

As soon as the AMERICAN PEOPLE realize that the dumbocraptic party is a terrorist organization, the sooner AMERICA will return to it’s status as the GREATEST nation on earth.

Dan Tyree
Dan Tyree
1 month ago

I don’t understand how anyone in their right mind can support the commie bastards

Joanne
Joanne
1 month ago

AMEN

Jawad
Jawad
1 month ago

I think the Democrats all slept through Civics class. They missed the part about the Declaration of Independence and core Constitutional values.