Star Dem witness Noah Feldman has also argued President Trump should be impeached for pardoning Sheriff Arpaio. Friendly reminder in an 1866 case SCOTUS held POTUS’s pardon power “extends to every offense known to the law.” The case’s name: Ex Parte Garland. pic.twitter.com/ehp5GZQKwC
— ImpeachmentElleWoods (@ElleImpeachment) December 4, 2019
How much do you have to hate President Trump to ignore basic facts when making grandiose claims? No one knows for sure, but Noah Feldman has crossed the threshold.
Feldman earlier proclaimed Trump should’ve been impeached for pardoning former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio. However, an 1866 Supreme Court case ruled the president’s pardon powers “extends to every offense known to the law.” Ex parte Garland is a well-known case for legal scholars. Moreover, the New York Times and Washington Post recently published articles asking if the president could pardon himself. Feldman’s ignorance is inexplicable.
AAN Staff
The staff at American Action News are consummate professionals, who when not producing original, hard-hitting content, are scouring the internet to bring you the unfiltered news that matters to you! Our mission is to maximize your experience on our website. If we can ever be of assistance, please do not hesitate to let us know!
