Whether unabashedly progressive or supposedly objective, the reaction from reporters was either apathy by what they perceived to be a punt or indignation after Mueller hardened their worst perceptions of the president.
One thing is for sure: their opinions are virtually certain to persuade no one.
>> @JudgeNap: “The evidence he laid out is remarkably similar to the impeachment charges against Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton” https://t.co/ARKh7Dta97
— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) May 29, 2019
English translation of Mueller:
Trump would have been indicted if he weren’t president.
— Joe Scarborough (@JoeNBC) May 29, 2019
Trump: No collusion.
Mueller: No evidence of a criminal conspiracy that could be charged.Trump: No obstruction
Mueller: No. Plenty of evidence. But we could not indict because of DOJ policy.— David Corn (@DavidCornDC) May 29, 2019
Over on Fox, @BretBaier calls Mueller’s statement “striking” and notes it was “not anywhere clear cut” as AG Bill Bar initially characterized it. “In fact, it was almost the opposite,” Baier said.
— Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy) May 29, 2019
AAN Staff
The staff at American Action News are consummate professionals, who when not producing original, hard-hitting content, are scouring the internet to bring you the unfiltered news that matters to you! Our mission is to maximize your experience on our website. If we can ever be of assistance, please do not hesitate to let us know!
