Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America via Wikimedia Commons

A new report indicates some California Democrats support efforts to recall California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D).

California Republicans have repeatedly floated recalling Newsom, but this is the first proposal with bipartisan support.

Per Fox News:

“We’ve gotten calls from Democrats who are already kicking the tires,’’ a Sacramento insider aligned with a major special interest group told the news outlet.

Newsom initially received praise for his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, but his credibility took a hit in the wake of an expensive dinner he had last month at French Laundry while telling Californians to stay at home.

“What makes this different is it’s Gavin Newsom itself,” Recall Gavin Newsom senior adviser Randy Economy told “America’s Newsroom” Tuesday.

“This governor is his own worst enemy, and every day he does something more that puts him deeper and deeper into controversy, and he’s become a problem here in California. He shut down the fifth-largest economy in the world the last nine months, and every single person out there in California should be outraged by that.”

So far, over 800,000 Californians have signed on to the campaign to recall Newsom. The number represents more than half of the 1.5 million signatures required by mid-March to get their effort on the ballot.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
36 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stephen Russell
Stephen Russell
1 year ago

Has 80K signatures to recall now
Need more
Come on down Dems OK Hooray

Cal
Cal
1 year ago

800k is old news. They have a million now

Edward Durham
Edward Durham
1 year ago

Lock downs bad decision, don’t work people are stupid being led around by you nose, you need to really look around do some investigating you’ll find out about all the lies that’s being put out to lead you around.

Brian Bowes
Brian Bowes
1 year ago
Reply to  Edward Durham

Just like my friend said how do we know this Covid vacine works does the survival rate go from 97.8 % to 98.8 % these numbers that the Main Stream Media spout are all to create mass hysteria and people with no common sense believe this.

Crystal Fenton
Crystal Fenton
1 year ago
Reply to  Brian Bowes

If we’re going to take a vaccine for a virus that only affects 1% of the people, and still mask, social distance and lockdown, than it should be 100% effective so we can immediately stop all that and completely go back to normal! We don’t even want to give them 98% effective, because they’ll just use that 2% to keep controlling us!

Louisa Swanson
Louisa Swanson
1 year ago
Reply to  Crystal Fenton

I WANT THIS VACCINE NO MATTER WHAT!! I;M A GROCERY CLERK AND I AM SICK OF THIS EVERY SINGLE DAMN DAY!!! I DON;T WANNA LIVE IN A CAVE FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE, I DON;LT CARE ABOUT NO SIDE EFFECTS, I WANT THIS AND I WANT THIS MASK OFF AND I WANT IT NOW!!!

Mary A Marner
Mary A Marner
1 year ago
Reply to  Louisa Swanson

The problem is that even with the vaccine you will still be living in a cave. The health “experts” say we will still have to wear masks and social distance. Do you actually believe that now that they have us where they want us they are going to set us free? Think again!!

Crystal Fenton
Crystal Fenton
1 year ago
Reply to  Louisa Swanson

We’ve never been able to eradicate the flu with a vaccine, because it’s a virus and it will just mutate to survive. And don’t think for one minute that the Democrats will let this pandemic go away! It’s too perfect a tool to use for fear-mongering, so good that Democrats have used it to literally change the way this country will be run, so they’re not going to stop using it! Besides, by the time we supposedly get this virus under control, you don’t think that the CCP isn’t back in their Labs right now trying to create an even worse virus that this vaccine will have no effect on!? The CCP has also seen how very effective their virus was…

Patricia Bess
Patricia Bess
1 year ago
Reply to  Brian Bowes

Right about that also.

Patricia Bess
Patricia Bess
1 year ago
Reply to  Edward Durham

You are right Edward

Crystal Fenton
Crystal Fenton
1 year ago
Reply to  Edward Durham

Yeah, if lockdowns, masking, and social distancing worked, you’d think after a year the virus would be gone. It’s getting control alright, but not of the virus…

Dan Winright
Dan Winright
1 year ago

I don’t think you can remove a queer from office per California law

Warren
Warren
1 year ago
Reply to  Dan Winright

Dan, I’m not a Democrat nor am I Gay but your comment is offensive to me and I am sure plenty of others. Next time use that tiny little brain of yours BEFORE you open your mouth.

Bushwacker
Bushwacker
1 year ago
Reply to  Warren

Dan tell them to Kiss your ads!
It hurt my feelings , get a f…g life!

Old man
Old man
1 year ago
Reply to  Warren

But you surely want to control others freedom of speech
You are a control freak idiot
A queer is a queer
Face the facts and STOP thinking that you have any rights to control others speech
You are part of the problem not any way part of a solution

Elizabeth
Elizabeth
1 year ago
Reply to  Warren

How about fegit. But queer will do. That is a gay person who is so stupid and ignorant.

od39@outlook.com
1 year ago
Reply to  Warren

Warren Kiss My ASS

od39@outlook.com
1 year ago
Reply to  Warren

If the queer did not want to be called queer than stay in the Closet . Don’t use it for Special Treatment

Mikey
Mikey
1 year ago
Reply to  Dan Winright

Exceptions, apparently, if his actions will slop back on the democrats.