By Lance Cpl. Suzanna Lapi - https://www.dvidshub.net/image/1000937/make-ready-kaneohe-bay-offers-recreational-fire, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=57344677

President Joe Biden’s nominee to head the ATF (Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms) David Chipman wilted under pressure from GOP Senator Ted Cruz on Wednesday, admitting during questioning that he in fact did want to ban Americans from owning AR-15’s.

WATCH:

Chipman has long been known for his dangerously unhinged views on the Second Amendment as well as being involved in the notorious siege of Waco, Texas which resulted in the deaths of 76 Americans, most of whom were women and children.

Yet in spite of Chipman’s insane ant-second amendment stance and highly questionable past if Biden has his way he will be in full control of one of America’s most powerful law enforcement organizations and have the power to target freedom-loving Americans at will.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
60 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David Baker
David Baker
3 months ago

Gun Laws to liberals are like pregnancies to unwed mothers: They’re going to be born unless they’re aborted. Our Constitution disallows such activity, but the regime we’ve (By ‘we’ve’, I mean voting machines and dead people) installed feels empowered to usurp our Bill of Rights, and impose tyranny upon the citizenry. Those “AR-15s” and other weapons were the means to unseat these politicians if they exceed their authority. We should start ‘aborting’ these people.

Dan Tyree
Dan Tyree
3 months ago
Reply to  David Baker

Democracy is a wolf, fox and a sheep voting on what to have for lunch. Real freedom is a well armed sheep

Robert6391
Robert6391
3 months ago
Reply to  David Baker

David Baker
Now you are going to take one complete sentence and break it down into two different sentences. Did you not have reading comprehension in your school.
2nd Amendment. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Now why exactly does the 2nd Amendment say that everyone has a right to keep and bear arms?
Now since we have that WELLL REGULATED MILITIA called the State National Guard, that fulfils the 2nd Amendment in every sense of the Word. So if you disregard that statement where is the WELLL REGULATED on the gun owners of this USA, now in the time when the 2nd was written every person 16 or over was in the Militia and they were REGULATED AND TRAINED by an active duty military officer, or NCO, where is that regulation today.
I am not against gun ownership, I actually own a lot of guns and all are in a secure gun safe with me ther only one knowing the combination and the safe deposit box at my bank has the combination also, but I also possess the only key.
The way it is now to many people can own a gun who should not even be allowed close to a gun because of their temperament, yet they have concealed carry permits.

Dan Tyree
Dan Tyree
3 months ago
Reply to  Robert6391

Go join your commie comrades and stfu. We have laws already on the books. And where you store your guns is your business, so don’t dictate to the rest of us. The 2nd amendment is the same now as it ever was

Mike
Mike
3 months ago
Reply to  Dan Tyree

Wrong answer, dipshit. WE THE PEOPLE are the militia.

Dan Tyree
Dan Tyree
3 months ago
Reply to  Mike

You’re a dumbass

JohnS
JohnS
3 months ago
Reply to  Robert6391

Nonsense, the Amendment is absolute and does not instill a new right since the colonists had this right from English common law. The founders were far better educated than we are today. This is a compound sentence with a dependent clause separated by a comma. Only the second clause has the elements to be a complete sentence and is independent from anything else. The dependent clause could say to hunt, to protect, or for sport but the independent clause does not change its meaning warning the federal government not to remove a right they already had. The AR 15 is not an assault weapon or the A standing for automatic and no different than any semi auto rifle among the dozens tha are so designed to simply look like one. Confiscation of the AR 15 means every rifle using the .226 bullet and magazine would fil the same citeria.

David Baker
David Baker
3 months ago
Reply to  JohnS

We should consider that our government is vastly more armed and organized than any militia. Back when this Amendment was written, Americans were equipped with roughly the same number and brands of rifles and pistols than the government. The government today will deploy Black Helicopters (Just ask Dr. Day about them) Black Vans (This was a Russian Bolshevik Scare Tactic) F-16s and tanks against an uprising of vengeful populations. The media, too, is in their ’employ’. We must emphasize the spirit of the founders, who ceded powers to U.S. citizens, and limited the powers of their governments. We can’t count on the media, so these remaining websites would be the sole resource to rally our contemporaries to take action against these tyrants. That would comprise a crucial element of our First Amendment. Exercising the 2nd Amendment would be akin to breaking the glass on a fire alarm.

Casey
Casey
3 months ago
Reply to  Robert6391

You state; “I am not against gun ownership,” YES YOU ARE.

MikeyW
MikeyW
3 months ago
Reply to  Robert6391

Why do you believe that “the people” means something different in the Second Amendment than it does everywhere else in the Constitution? “Militia” was considered to be the able-bodied male population within a certain age range, generally 16-45. “Well-regulated” was understood to mean trained in the use of weapons. The National Guard can be considered the organized militia, but there remains the unorganized militia, i.e., the people.

I’m glad that you are a responsible gun owner. I agree that there are people who should not be allowed anywhere near a gun, but to extrapolate that since there are some people temperamentally unsuited to have guns (according to whom?) who have concealed carry permits should not vitiate the rights of the rest of us.

R. B. Blackstone
R. B. Blackstone
3 months ago
Reply to  Robert6391

Robert6391 , and others who follow his thinking.
Look up, Read, and Understand in full detail, including the historical detail, 10 USC, Section 311 and Section 312.
Your chosen search engine will find it for you.
Search the history behind 10 USC and you will find it has existed since 1782 and was first called the Militia Act. That Militia Act required ALL male Citizens age 17 years to be armed and possess ammunition and be ready to be called upon to defend the Country against all enemies, both Foreign and Domestic. Further, to maintain readiness until age 45 years, unless they served in the military then that upper age of 45 years is extended to 60 years.
The Militia Act continued without modification since 1782, without modification in content, under a number of names until it was brought under USC which codified all laws unto a uniform format.
The fact that YOU, Robert6391, were required by law, to register for the draft, even though the draft is not currently used, is because of 10 USC, Sec 311 and Sec 312.
The original law remains unchanged, except to add Women into the text, most recently.
The fact remains, unless you have been adjudicated as mentally unfit, or physically unable to serve, you are REQUIRED as a Citizen, by Federal Law to be armed and provisioned with ammunition.
Read it for yourself and make your own decision.

George
George
3 months ago
Reply to  Robert6391

Gave up carrying a gun; people like you want to make me use it.

David Baker
David Baker
3 months ago
Reply to  Robert6391

I’m not a gun nut, and I ditched many comprehension classes during my school tenure. One thing people should question is why we need guns anyway? I can tell you from personal experience that the criminal class of people in the U.S. are prone to employ weapons during their robberies, carjackings, home invasions and gang activities. We need to kill these people to protect ourselves if they produce those weapons and threaten our lives. We’re also informed that our government is releasing thousands of hardened, violent criminals from jails and prisons, due to overcrowding. It would be the height of naivete to expect such people to abide by the laws, or not to obtain weapons on the black market when they resume their ‘careers’. The Framers ratified our 2nd Amendment with the knowledge that an armed and resolute citizenry will overwhelm a tyrannical government, and remove the same under the spirit of that Amendment. However, the morons in our government who unleash violent criminals who’ll present even more immediate threats simply furnished an additional justification for arming American citizens. (You might read about Australia’s Gun Laws, and how those now disarmed people live in fear of gun wielding criminals.)

William
William
3 months ago
Reply to  David Baker

Great points made here. Good job.

David Baker
David Baker
3 months ago
Reply to  William

Thanks.

Peter Wiggin
Peter Wiggin
3 months ago
Reply to  Robert6391

Giggle…

So authoritative…

…and yet so wrong

(So the Government should have the militia that challenges the Tyrannical Government)

Bob Johnson
Bob Johnson
3 months ago
Reply to  Robert6391

It is necessary to regulate militias well in order to have a free State. Not infringing on the right of the people to keep and bear arms is the best way to ensure the militia remains well regulated and not used by the politicians against the people.

David Baker
David Baker
3 months ago
Reply to  Bob Johnson

Liberals interpret a ‘Militia” being a government entity, such as the military and police. They also ‘assume’ that these militias are formed and structured. Both assumptions are indicative of their stupidity. We wouldn’t need a 2nd Amendment if our leaders complied with the limits of their authority. So the framers not only provided the citizenry with the means to unseat tyrants (Like Numb Nuts) but they labeled those citizens as a militia when the time came to apply their Civil Rights. The entire population of our country can become a Militia.

Pissed Off American
Pissed Off American
3 months ago
Reply to  Robert6391

Really! So what your saying is that every gun owner may have a temper tantrum and might shoot someone. So a Government paper stacker gets to decide who may or may not own a gun. SO WHO GAVE PERMISSION FOR YOU TO HAVE GUNS and what are the Specifications for you to have guns? Isn’t that what these “RED FLAG LAWS” are about? On one hand you sound like your pro 2A and on the other you sound like your the only one who should have a gun?

Yours are so SAFE and unavailable that in an emergency you would be dead before you could get to them. As far as I’m concerned guns are “SELF PROTECTION TOOL”, just like a hammer, chunk of metal, machine in your hand.
I have several hammers in half pound to twelve pounds in brass, leather, copper, steel, rubber. Doesn’t matter which one I beat you with your still dead. I could care less on the legal BS of who or what should own a gun. Sure criminals don’t need them as they have proven felon’s are dangerous to the public. I’m responsible for my actions and protecting myself from danger and government over reach. If I need a gun, then pity the moron that thinks he is going to get it by telling me to turn it in. I’m a big boy, know what to do. Don’t need ass wiped by some “WOKE” politician or Antifa or English teacher. So how many “Concealed Carry” shootings have you read about that were from temper tantrums? I doubt many.

William
William
3 months ago

That is 2 Pissed off Americans!!

t.j. walier
t.j. walier
3 months ago
Reply to  Robert6391

It protects us from people like you who support people like them

Tom McDonald
Tom McDonald
3 months ago
Reply to  Robert6391

The constitution doesn’t give you the right to keep them bear arms it. The right to keep that weapon is a natural right and the constitution prevents the government from infringing on that right. The reasoning the founders gave For including the second amendment with so that they people could resist the government if it became to tyrannical.

David Baker
David Baker
3 months ago
Reply to  Tom McDonald

Interpretation is ancillary to the topic of gun rights. The fundamental purpose of our 2nd Amendment is to maintain a Free State, which was defined by the Constitution. When our freedoms are threatened, we can form militias to remove tyrants who present such threats. Our current regime cowers in fear of the reprisals they’re engendering by their oppressive legislation and censoring of their opposition. Hence, they’re pulling out all the stops to disarm that opposition in preparation for their next round of tyrannical antics.

William
William
3 months ago
Reply to  Robert6391

So, what is your point. Regarding a concealed carry permit, you have to pass a background check, show you are able to use a firearm in a safe manner and good character The issue isn’t people with a concealed permit if you are referencing people who shot or kill other people for no just cause. There are gangs, drugs, criminals, and nut cases who shouldn’t have a gun in the first place. Don’t punish the good for the bad. God forbid that we get to the situation where we will need to go against our government due to tyranny. But if it materializes we will have a trainined militia.

Camus
Camus
3 months ago
Reply to  Robert6391

I’d call you a soft target

Peter Wiggin
Peter Wiggin
3 months ago
Reply to  David Baker

Funny…

…this guy has an apparent long arm, standing in the ruins of Civilian Buildings

Bemused Berserker
Bemused Berserker
3 months ago

Chipman must be prevented from leading the ATF by any and all means possible, and I do mean all means!!!

Eagle Wolf
Eagle Wolf
3 months ago

It’s time, no it’s past time, for republicans to do the job they are paid soo well for.

David Baker
David Baker
3 months ago
Reply to  Eagle Wolf

I’ll reiterate that NO Republicans are in congress. There would be no Hate Crime Laws if Republicans were in Congress. Affirmative Action Laws would not exist. No Abortions would be funded with federal or other public monies. No Wars would be ‘authorized’ unilaterally by a President. No Foreign Aid would be paid with our taxes. No “PATRIOT Act” would have been necessary or renewed. Our budgets would be balanced during each fiscal year. No Foreign countries would have offices or PACs within the United States arranging for campaign funding or other election functions. No Illegal Aliens would be allowed to cross our borders, nor would they be eligible for benefits paid by our taxes. No religious sect would be protected by our government. No Anti-Gun Legislation would exist. Our government would function under the Constitution if true Republicans were in Washington and the states.

Pawn
Pawn
3 months ago

chippman is a coward and always has been. He is not qualified to wipe butts. He should be hung for what happened at waco along with all the others who participated. Me I would have walked up to the door, knocked on the door, and told the people to come on out. It would have worked too.

Eagle Wolf
Eagle Wolf
3 months ago
Reply to  Pawn

I don’t understand why the man they wanted soo bad was not arrested when he was in town, basically by himself?

King Fisher
King Fisher
3 months ago
Reply to  Eagle Wolf

It’s because Butch Reno wanted to make a huge splash and do a big gun raid, justifying the militarization of the ATF. After it was over and the inhabitants were incinerated, she concocted the lie that the children were being molested. She made damn sure it wouldn’t continue by burning them alive.

Camus
Camus
3 months ago
Reply to  Eagle Wolf

Absolutely correct. Every morning he ate breakfast at the same restaurant at the same time. He drove a black Firebird. The BATF knew that. He could have been arrested anytime over many weeks.

Number two, his religion was/is protected under the First Amendment…until a warrantable crime was issued by a judge.

His religion was odd and unconventional. but so was Christianity at the time.

Mass murder was committed by our government at Waco.

Murder was committed…by the BATF at Ruby Ridge.

GOVERNMENT sanctioned murder. No recourse, no warrant, no justice.

It can happen to you. just because you posted an email.

Have fear, or be ready for the next revolution. REVOLUTION not Civil War. And, yes, I know about war…. I fought in three…and saw the results.

David Baker
David Baker
3 months ago
Reply to  Camus

A Civil War would advance the goals of liberals. Not only would such a melee authorize Numb Nuts to declare Martial Law, but our demise would achieve the goals of a globalist campaign. You do know that a ‘Global’ agenda to cull huge swaths of the human population is currently in vogue? Populations shooting each other would fit nicely into that scheme. We’re being maneuvered in such a manner by the media/government amalgamation to consider conducting such a conflict. What we need to do is invoke the Constitution to demand that our leadership comply with the limiting parameters of that charter. The Framers made sure we would have the teeth necessary to demonstrate that resolve.

R. B. Blackstone
R. B. Blackstone
3 months ago
Reply to  Pawn

“He is not qualified to wipe butts”
Notice is taken, however, that he does have a high degree of developed skill at sniffing butts…
[Just what the big boys at the pool hall were saying at noon]

Pissed Off American
Pissed Off American
3 months ago
Reply to  Pawn

Seem that the ATF wanted a show of force so they attacked. They didn’t expect them to shoot back. When they did they went hog wild to prove they were “From the Government and here to help you”. By burning down the place and killing everybody. They want the public to be scared of them so everybody kisses their ass and jumps through hoops when they bark. I don’t think the People are afraid of them any more as they are seeing what behind the Democrap agenda today.

David Baker
David Baker
3 months ago

You’ve got the general idea. Liberals are quite adept at provoking their opponents to either violence or to utter one of many ‘unapproved’ statements. They then have justification to mobilize their legal and law enforcement resources to counter such ‘violations’. Eventually, those law enforcement and other government resources become alarmingly authoritarian, and even the whiners realize they’ve unleashed a tyrannical juggernaut of bureaucrats and shyster advocates upon themselves and their posterity.