Smash the Iron Cage via Wikimedia Commons

Advertisement
Help President Trump Stop Joe Biden [ACT NOW]

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled against Wisconsin Democrats’ request to allow an extension for mail-in ballots received after the polls close on Election Day. (Fox News)

In a 5-3 ruling, the justices refused to reinstate a lower court order that called for mailed ballots to be counted if they are received up to six days after the Nov. 3 election. A federal appeals court had already put that order on hold.

Democrats argued that the flood of absentee ballots and other challenges posed by the coronavirus pandemic makes it necessary to extend the period in which ballots can be counted. Wisconsin is one of the nation’s hot spots for COVID-19, with hospitals treating a record high number of patients with the disease.

The Wisconsin Department of Health Services said that more than 201,000 people in the state have tested positive for COVID-19 as of Monday.

The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals had approved a six-day extension of a deadline for absentee ballots to be received in Wisconsin. Absentee ballots postmarked on or before Election Day would have been counted as long as they came in before Nov. 9.

Republicans consistently opposed extending the November 3 deadline, saying voters will have ample opportunities to cast their ballots by the time polls close on Election Day.

Advertisement
Help President Trump Stop Joe Biden [ACT NOW]

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jesicajame
Jesicajame
1 year ago

Start your Home work Now .A month prior I GOT check of nearly Thirty three Thousand Us Dollars this online work is essential and direct, don’t have to go OFFICE, Its home online movement…<a href=”https://xurl.es/veksb” title=”” rel=”nofollow” target=”_blank”><b>Work71</b></a>

Jesicajame
Jesicajame
1 year ago
Reply to  Jesicajame

just copy URL Thank you

CrustyOldGeezer
CrustyOldGeezer
1 year ago

When a person is tested for, and found positive for ….covid…..do they treat ONLY THE COVID and ignore the Cancer or whatever other 13 million other ’causes of death?

Herman Cain died from Cancer.

Did he test positive for covid, so they stopped treating the cancer and only treated for covid?

Since the ‘tests’ became more common and quicker, they have begun COUNTING POSITIVE TESTS as ACTUAL CASES.

Tomahawk
Tomahawk
1 year ago

They’ve been counting positive tests as covid cases from the beginning, as well as many other nefarious stunts.

Truckman
Truckman
1 year ago
Reply to  Tomahawk

what I want to know how many real cases there active now not what was but is

TAM'STER
TAM'STER
1 year ago
Reply to  Truckman

According to a study by UCLA and Stanford, people that died had 2.5 other DEADLY diseases. And when this study was performed (late June 2020) less than 10,000 people have really died of Covid, less than the regular Flu.
Less that being struck by lightning 1 in 161,856…less than death by a car accident 1 in 114. BECAUSE in a person in the age group of 50-64 that has been EXPOSED to a copied patient one time, on average, had a 1 in 852,000 chance of being hospitalizes and a 1 in 1.9 MILLION chance of dying.
THE STUDY ASSUMES THE SAME RISK FOR EVERY INDIVIDUAL, EXCEPT PEOPLE WITH PRE-EXISTING HEALTH PROBLEMS.

Mark
Mark
1 year ago
Reply to  Tomahawk

they have been counting anyone that has been tested and many that have NEVER been tested as POSITIVE, it’s total BS brought on by the DemonRats and Media to Scare the people into submission

Mark
Mark
1 year ago

and it doesn’t take much Covid in the system to count ti as a open case, most of the time there isn’t enough of the Covid to kill a FLY let alone a Human.

Joey Baloney
Joey Baloney
1 year ago

the CDC admitted that 96% of people who died with COVID positive had underlying conditions.

Gary Rademacher
Gary Rademacher
1 year ago

This is bullshit when the Supreme Court won’t protect the right to vote and be counted!

jtom
jtom
1 year ago

You have the right to vote and be counted, but you must do so within the AMPLE amount of time you have been given. No ones rights have been diminished.

LiberalTearsAreMyVictory

Basically the Supreme Court is saying, “ get off your ass and vote within the parameters that are in place”… you don’t get to change the rules/laws because of laziness or some other lame excuse! Grow up!

Alvina Sedwick
Alvina Sedwick
1 year ago

Totally agree if theY can go shopping every where they please, they can go vote on time or it should not count bunch of BS

Mark
Mark
1 year ago

IF they can go to Walmart and burn building down they can damn sure vote.

Tomahawk
Tomahawk
1 year ago

Translation: This is bullshit when the Supreme Court won’t protect the right to cheat and be counted.

tractor man
tractor man
1 year ago

****SNOWFLAKE ALERT****- people have plenty of time to vote by absentee ballot, in person early voting or on the 3rd when the polls are open to everyone.

TomB
TomB
1 year ago

This is bullshit when YOU think your right to vote is being demolished and not be counted when you are given ample time to register and submit your vote by the dates established for doing so which are well advertised and known to all. No one is not protecting your right to vote…period…

Truckman
Truckman
1 year ago
Reply to  TomB

that’s for sure when I started voting many years ago we had one day election day now there is almost a month to get it done if you cannot get it done in that time you are not trying