Sgt. Arjenis Nunez / Public domain



Following a series of Russian provocations in recent weeks, a U.S. Army Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle was filmed on February 19th aggressively running a Russian police or military vehicle off the road in Syria near the Turkish border. While some inaccurately reported it as a “road rage” incident, it was an inevitable reaction to months of Russian pressuring and testing U.S. forces.

It is also an example of how Russian provocations could quickly escalate into open conflict with U.S. forces.

In this latest case, the Russian vehicle aggressively and recklessly tried to pass the U.S. Army convoy, inserting itself within the convoy at times, prior to the U.S. vehicle forcing it off the road. The Russian actions violate agreements between the U.S. and Russia to avoid contact and steer clear of each other in Syria but have become a common tactic employed by Russia.

The U.S. has a relatively small military force in Syria, mostly positioned in the northeast to protect the oil fields.

Russian troops have increasingly had other clashes with U.S. forces on highways in Syria, and Russian helicopters have been “buzzing” American troops on the ground. Most seriously, an American-led convoy came under attack and exchanged fire with forces at a checkpoint loyal to President Bashar al-Assad, who is backed by Russia. More skirmishes should be expected as Russia continues to test U.S. resolve.

According to the NYT, “American officials say these actions by Russian personnel and their Syrian allies are devised to present a constant set of challenges, probes and encroachments to slowly create new facts on the ground and make the U.S. military presence there more tenuous.”

While the Russians hope to avoid a direct confrontation with American troops that could risk escalation, Russia and its local allies will probably continue this low-level campaign of minor challenges to make President Trump decide to pull out completely.

As Charles R. Lister, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute said to the NYT, “A few random, unpredictable clashes or run-ins … could easily get onto Trump’s radar and pave a path towards a full American withdrawal.”

We can only hope that these Russian provocations will be met with the appropriate U.S. resolve.

Paul Crespo is a national security expert and communications consultant. As an officer in the US Marine Corps, he served as a military attaché with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) at several US embassies worldwide. Paul was also an Adjunct Professor of Political Science at the University of Miami and a member of the Miami Herald Editorial Board. He holds degrees from Georgetown, London, and Cambridge Universities. Paul is CEO of SPECTRE Global Risk, a security consultancy, and a Contributor to American Defense News.

Paul Crespo is the Managing Editor of American Defense News. A defense and national security expert, he served as a Marine Corps officer and as a military attaché with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) at US embassies worldwide. Paul holds degrees from Georgetown, London, and Cambridge Universities. He is also CEO of SPECTRE Global Risk, a security advisory firm, and President of the Center for American Defense Studies, a national security think tank.

Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments